Coltman v bibby 1988
WebColtman v Bibby Tankers (1988) It was claimed by the plaintiff that the ship was defectively constructed, and he argued that this constituted defects in equipment on the basis that the ship was ‘equipment’ within s 1 of the Employers’ Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969. The court held that the meaning of the word ‘equipment’ was ... WebSee Coltman v Bibby Tankers Ltd [1988] AC 276. ... R v Peters (1886) 16 QBD 636, at 641 (per Lord Coleridge) e.g. Shakespeare, Othello, “moving accidents by flood and field” Othello was referring to “intentional as well as fortuitous events of which he had been the unhappy subject. ...
Coltman v bibby 1988
Did you know?
WebColtman v Bibby Tankers [1988] 1 AC 276 dealt with whether the MV Derbyshire, a 97,000 tonne merchant vessel, fell within the Act (it did, said the Lords). In similar vein Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1994] ICR 243 dealt with whether a flagstone being laid by a highway worker fell within the Act (again, WebColtman v Bibby Tankers Ltd [1988] AC 276: ship sunk of Japan with loss of all hands o compensaion claimed by family of sailor o ship lost due to defect in its construcion? o acion against deceased sailor’s employer Admiralty Court (1) Court of Appeal (3) House of Lords (5) About a ship sailing from England sank of the coats of japan and all ...
WebColtman v Bibby Tankers 1988. Employers liability when employees suffer injury while using their equipment. Crew of a ship had drowned due to the unseaworthiness of their ship. Provision stated that equipment "includes any plant and machinery, vehicle, aircraft and clothing". Went on appeal to the House of Lords who held that although not ... WebMay 27, 1999 · Mr O'Carroll also submitted that cases such as Coltman v Bibby Tankers Ltd 1988 1 A.C. 276, Ralston v Greater Glasgow Health Board 1987 S.L.T. 386 and Knowles v Liverpool City Council 1991 W.L.R. 1428 which were based on the Employer's Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969 were of no assistance in this case because that …
Web“CITY DIRECTORY 1988 (THE)”’, 549 “CIVIL JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS”, 535 CIVIL JURISDICTION AND JUDGMENTS ... (Coltman v. … WebTempest v. Kilner 1846 ; 11 Intrinsic aids to interpretation . Help that can be found within a statute. Long title (R v. Galvin (1987) Inclusory words or lists (Coltman v. Bibby Tankers (1988)) Statements of principle within the Act; 12 Extrinsic aids to interpretation. Help that can be found outside a statue. Dictionaries ; Explanatory notes ...
WebBux v Slough Metals (1974) 1 All ER 262 Coltman v Bibby Tankers Ltd [1988] AC 276 Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428. A Safe Place of Work: …
WebDec 19, 2024 · • See: Coltman v Bibby Tankers Ltd [1988] AC 276 • See: other difficult words (satisfactory, cause, welfare, safe system of work, defect, pollution) Statutory Interpretation Legal Methods and systems Precedent and statutory interpretation. ... • Carter v Bradbeer [1975] All ER 158 – Lord Diplock: “If one looks back to the decisions of ... gear shifter tattooWebColtman v Bibby Tankers [1988] Employers have a vicarious liability, where injury was due to a defect caused by a third party, the employer should be liable regardless of own … gear up meaingWebAug 26, 2024 · Coltman v Bibby Tankers [1988] AC 276 In this case the Court of Appeal held that an injury sustained because of a defect in the hull of a ship was not actionable, … gear liberatorsgearbest shipping insuranceWebColtman v. Bibby Tankers Ltd. (The Derbyshire) - Court of Appeal (O’Connor, Lloyd and Glidewell L.JJ.) - 27 January 1987 Ship is not “equipment” The plaintiffs were the … gear up companyWebCollins v Wilcock [1984] 3 All ER 374 Coltman v Bibby Tankers (The Derbyshire) [1988] AC 276 Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463 Cork v Kirkby McClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 – Causation Cork v Kirkby McClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 – Clinical Negligence Corr v IBC Vehicles [2008] UKHL 13 gearhead bluetooth keyboard kb7000unvWebIn Coltman v Bibby Tankers Ltd [1988] AC 276, a ship was held to fall under ‘plant and equipment’ under the Act. See also the Provision and Use of See also the Provision and Use of End of preview. gear s app